INTRO,

My name is Christopher Gabriel Brown I am interested in spreading my opinion in a persuasive manner like the way an Attorney would to a court room or to a Judge with intent to present my own character for intelligence estimations. With some kind of formalities understood I will switch to a more analytical and comparative way of writing. Many of my short essays are conversational and to say simply this way entirely in eloquent.

Chapter 1, “Are you cool?”

The young and restless nearly exhaust this to the point of no tangible meaning. Young people dress according to cool. The meaning of the word “cool” is light coldness. My instinct is that my own personal definition of cool will always be cool only because I’m cool (second slang.) I am a director / builder with very small follow ship traits. The ethics of my morals are my own personal instinct.

My own abnormalities eventually are attractive to leadership and others. The purest way I could say that I am myself and no one else can change what I am is to be the person true to myself. The trail of trends is that most people follow the lines to make amends. This isn’t necessarily my way of thought. The best and lenient way of saying to someone else in a polite way this (example this) or that may be agreeable or the way to agree to disagree is my way.

Translations of lies and deceit are the core of my cool. In order to make a light (or medium) deciphering of a point of view is my way of describing how to become understood in a meaningful path. Plainly spoken to get along with others and play well makes friendliness. To see a person is to nearly understand that they are there. To watch a person is to see them behave. When I see a person being themselves is to befriend their being. Simply said this way, that the best of us cannot always get along but the most of us can have fun.

Chapter 2, Irrational Pain In Love

To describe my feelings are the antagonistic way of objecting this next thought here. The pain experience felt during a emotional obsession may be confused as love. Not all relationships have the same way of feeling between two people. Some times when this occurs it’s usually not love. The common phrase of “In-Love” makes this subject become meaningful. When two people love each other then that is called love.

So in reverse objective reality wouldn’t it become the same for hate? It would take two people to be “In-Hate.” Or would it realize a awkward symmetrical imbalance. Most of the time when war occurs it’s one of offense and defense. So not all things are equal, what I’m trying to convey is that love and hate are not equal. Majority of wars are one against another with little or no intent to harm both. (both-being the same equal amount of war using offense.)

Easily put this way Children will always admit to someone of authority, “who started it.” The intelligence of an authority makes the most sense to all when the culprit of the dispute is found guilty. Given in all obviousness with out any chance of arguments left un noticed. To myself the extreme topic of racism is unacceptable. In my past reading there was a single most important moment. To summarize a existing race would be to label a feather.

Chapter 3, Motif and Critiques

For Arts sake I would like to make a ending in conversational prose, followed by a fatalistic conclusion. Today children all want to be cool. With drugs at an extreme height and society at an all time decline - the motives of accountability are simply being lost. Easy for me to say, easy for me to point out, but never done and gone. With cool being stupid and less is now never more, the mysteries known as personal taste has never been worse.

Ways of tradition are nearly at complete loss. To only see that fights and age old battles are neither worth their weight in gold and the intent to harm isn’t generally lucid in any plot. The mystique of the motif and made up critiques is what reputations are worth. Personal opinion is and will always be just that. The fascinations of a just judgment are themselves objective. To explain a joke is to tell a funny wisecrack. “If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?” To synonymously sample of Southern Humor, two fold, if a person is murdered and no one sees it, are they still dead?

CONCLUSION,

In honorable presence of all being fixated or understood as a non opinionated short, this is my formal way of expressing in words the thoughts I hold true to be slated as my most truthful and objective essay I’m capable of at the moment. If I have conveyed my endorsements in full or near acceptable understanding as I desire. My work is finished.

Thank you… Crioner.

"objectivism." Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. 2009. Merriam-Webster Online. 9 February 2009 <http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objectivism>

| http://astore.amazon.com/live05219-20 Crioner Store>